New Zealand shooting further evidence that stricter gun laws are necessary

Kris Long, Staff Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






The world is still reeling from the bloody attack on New Zealand’s Muslim population that left at least 50 dead on March 15. In the aftermath, heads are turned to politicians around the world asking what can be done to prevent another massacre.

In the United States, shootings like this have been met with the all too common ‘thoughts and prayers,’ as well as half mast flags”

The attack was committed by a white supremacist from Australia. He streamed the attack live to his Facebook page and had recently published his bigoted manifesto “The Great Replacement” online. The terrorist also legally owned a variant of an AR-15, a semi-automatics weapon.

In the United States, shootings like this have been met with the all too common “thoughts and prayers,” as well as half mast flags. In fact, when 58 people were killed in Las Vegas in 2017, President Donald Trump’s reaction was the also infamous “time and place for political debate.”

On March 21, New Zealand officially banned military style weapons”

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s response to the shooting stands in stark contrast. “Within 10 days of this horrific act of terrorism we will have announced reforms that will, I believe, make our country safer,” said Arden, 72 hours after the attack. On March 21, New Zealand officially banned military style weapons and has started the organization of a buyback program.

What is perhaps most alarming about the attack is that New Zealand already has relatively strict gun laws compared to the U.S. The safety measures include taking a firearms course, having an extensive criminal background check as well as specific permission from police to own handguns, semi-automatics and fully automatics. Gun licenses expire after 10 years. For comparison, in the U.S, federally, you must be licensed in order to own an automatic weapon or long gun. However, there are no federal restrictions on semi-automatics weapons or handguns.

But in 2016 in the U.S. there were 38,658 gun deaths”

There is no reason for there not to be restrictions on these weapons. There is no need to have semi-automatics or handguns in civilian hands, nobody is going hunting with a semi-automatic, nobody needs a semi-automatic for home protection. The argument that civilians should be allowed to own handguns for home protection also flawed as many more people die from accidental gun deaths than from home invasions.

New Zealand’s total gun deaths levels are relatively low. In 2015, 55 people were killed by guns, or around 1.24 per 100,000 people. That includes homicides, accidental gun deaths and suicides.  As noted above, in New Zealand semi-automatics and handguns are restricted. In the United Kingdom, where handguns and semi-automatics are illegal, in 2013, 144 people died. That’s 0.23 per 100,000 people, a significantly lower rate than New Zealand.

But in 2016 in the U.S. there were 38,658 gun deaths, 11.96 per 100,000 people and, as noted above, the U.S. has no federal regulations on handguns or semi-automatics. As shown the basic trend is that the tighter the gun regulations the lower the gun deaths per 100,000 people.

So far in 2019 one person has been shot and killed in the U.K., 50+ people have been shot and killed in New Zealand and 3,088 people have been shot and killed in the U.S., 511 of whom were children or teenagers.

People are quite literally dying and politicians are too cowardly to do anything about it.”

One last set of statistics. This is the first mass shooting in New Zealand since the Raurimu massacre in 1997, which killed six people. There is no record of a shooting killing over 30 people in New Zealand before this attack. In the U.K. since the Dunblane school shooting in Scotland in 1996, which sparked the extremely restrictive gun policy currently in place, there has been one mass shooting in the U.K. killing 12 people. In the U.S., the last mass shooting was on February 5, six people were killed. In 2019 so far there have been 63 mass shootings in the U.S. (two or more dead). In the last decade, there have been six mass shootings that each killed more than 15 people in the U.S.

So why is tightening gun restriction controversial? People are quite literally dying and politicians are too cowardly to do anything about it. The lack of progress is partly for fear of losing voters and partly due to intensive lobbying on the behalf of The National Rifle Association as well as gun and munitions manufacturers. Even if gun restrictions are passed in the U.S. they will likely look like New Zealand’s gun restrictions before the attack, which will not eliminate but will greatly reduce the problem.

There is one clear and obvious solution: vote for politicians that will ban civilian ownership of handguns and semi-automatics. By doing this you are doing something much more American than participating in your second amendment right, you’re participating in the American democracy that strives to protect its constituents.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
1 Comment

One Response to “New Zealand shooting further evidence that stricter gun laws are necessary”

  1. Sam Erker on April 15th, 2019 3:42 pm

    In your last paragraph you say that people should vote for politicians that will ban civilian ownership of handguns and semiautomatics, but by doing so they would be banning all guns available to civilians. All firearms availiable to the public are semi-automatic, handguns are also considered semiautomatic, so next time please do some research before publishing an article

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




The student news site of Manhattan High School
New Zealand shooting further evidence that stricter gun laws are necessary